Prepared for Aurora Denver Cardiology Associates · a HealthONE Heart Care LLC practice · 2026 Remote Care Strategy Review · Confidential — not for distribution
Cardiovascular Service Line Optimization · Denver–Aurora–Centennial · CBSA 19740

A Scalable, Profitable Remote Care Service Line
for Aurora Denver Cardiology Associates.

From 1 January 2026, all six HCA HealthONE hospitals these clinicians practice in are mandatory participants in the Transforming Episode Accountability Model — CABG included. Thirty days of post-discharge accountability now attaches to hospital CCNs. The cardiologists who actually control those thirty days work in a different clinical record, and across all 44 roster NPIs with CY2024 claims, transitional care management, remote physiologic monitoring and principal care management bill zero.

$0
24-Month Net Reimbursement
0%
24-Month Practice Margin
0
Hospitalizations Avoided
0
Unique Patients in Active Remote Care at Month 24

Source: the companion CoachCare Value Analysis workbook, MAC locality CO • 04112-01.
Read this before you read the numbers: 57.6% of Arapahoe County's Medicare beneficiaries are enrolled in Medicare Advantage. Every figure on this page is a fee-for-service figure priced at the Physician Fee Schedule locality. For the Medicare Advantage majority, payment for these code families is contract-dependent — federal law sets a floor of at least 100% of the Medicare rate, which is not a guarantee that a given plan pays remote monitoring and care management on the same terms, or separately at all. The Medicare Advantage book is larger than the modeled book and is priced contract by contract.

The Position of Strength

The Layer That Pays Is the Only Layer Missing

This is not a group that needs convincing that protocol-driven, nurse-run, between-visit care works. Its own Medicare claims show it running exactly that model — at volume, on the device side, with consent and a clinic workflow already in place. The physiologic and care-management layer sitting directly beside it is simply unstaffed and unbilled.

★ Verified — CY2024 claims

1,282 remote cardiac device beneficiary-instances

CPT 93294 · 93295 · 93296 · 93297 · 93298, roughly $171,000 of Medicare allowed across up to eleven of the roster's billing clinicians in CY2024 fee-for-service. These patients already have remote data flowing, consent in place and a device-clinic workflow around them. It is the highest-confidence enrollable cohort in the account.

✓ Verified — the group's own service pages

A named anticoagulation clinic, renal denervation, structural heart and EP

A Protime anticoagulation clinic is named explicitly on the electrophysiology service page. The interventional page carries renal denervation for resistant hypertension; the structural-heart page carries TAVR, transcatheter mitral repair and left-atrial-appendage occlusion. Scheduled non-visit touches under protocol are an established habit here, not a new concept.

★ Verified — CY2024 claims

$436,532 of an adherence-dependent injectable, on 74 beneficiaries

Inclisiran (HCPCS J1306) is office-administered, twice-yearly and entirely dependent on the patient coming back. It is the clearest example in the billing record of a therapy whose economics improve when somebody is actively managing the patient between visits — which is precisely what nobody is being paid to do today.

★ Verified — the whitespace

Care management at zero across all 44 roster NPIs with CY2024 claims

Every provider was queried individually across the full care-management set: remote physiologic monitoring (99453 · 99454 · 99457 · 99458), 99091, chronic care management, principal care management (99424–99427) and transitional care management (99495 · 99496). Zero services, on every code, for every provider.

Scale is not the constraint either: 48 enrolled clinicians — 25 physicians and 23 advanced practice providers — across seven Denver-metro offices, credentialed into six HCA HealthONE hospitals, with rural outreach clinics reaching southern and eastern Colorado and western Nebraska. The operating habit exists. The billable layer on top of it does not.

The 2026 Payment Shift

A Mandatory Episode Model Landed on Every Hospital This Group Works In

It is live, it is dated, and CABG is inside it. The obligation sits on hospital CMS Certification Numbers — and the physicians who determine how those episodes end sit outside the entity that carries the risk.

Live since 1 Jan 2026
TEAM · CBSA 19740

Both Admitting Hospitals Are Mandated In

CCN 060100 (HCA HealthONE Aurora, The Medical Center of Aurora) and CCN 060112 (HCA HealthONE Sky Ridge) are both Mandatory participants in the Transforming Episode Accountability Model, CBSA 19740 Denver–Aurora–Centennial, performance period 1 Jan 2026 – 31 Dec 2030, per the CMS TEAM participant list as of 15 Apr 2026.

And it is not only those two. All six HCA HealthONE hospitals where these clinicians hold practice addresses are mandatory participants — CCNs 060014, 060032, 060034, 060065, 060100 and 060112. CBSA 19740 contains 21 TEAM hospitals in total; the division operates six of them.

The episode that matters here
CABG

A Cardiac Episode, Owned by a CCN This Group Does Not Hold

Coronary artery bypass grafting is one of the five TEAM episode families. TEAM holds the participant hospital accountable for the 30 days after discharge, readmissions included, and expects the hospital to support continuity of care after the patient goes home.

Said plainly: this group has no CMS Certification Number and is not itself a TEAM participant. TEAM participation attaches to a hospital CCN. But the interventional, structural and electrophysiology clinicians in this group are the physician-side actors in those episodes, and the ambulatory follow-up they run is the mechanism by which a 30-day episode either holds or fails.

Billing tailwind
CY2026

Short-Window RPM Is Now Billable

New codes 99445 (2–15-day device supply) and 99470 (first 10 minutes of management) make short post-discharge and post-procedure monitoring windows cleanly billable — removing the 16-day floor that previously blocked episodic remote care. That is exactly the window a 30-day episode is decided in.

CMS rulemaking for CY2027 is in progress — remote-monitoring code values can move inside the 24 months modeled here.

The market fact that governs every number on this page
  • 57.6% of Arapahoe County's 108,185 Medicare beneficiaries are enrolled in Medicare Advantage — against 52.4% for Colorado and 51.2% nationally (CMS Medicare Monthly Enrollment, April 2026 file).
  • 59.4% across the six-county Denver metro: 473,415 Medicare beneficiaries in total, of whom only 192,405 — about 41% — remain in Original Medicare. Adams County is the highest at 64.6%.
  • Contract-dependent, not fee-schedule-fixed Remote monitoring and care management are Physician Fee Schedule benefits. Inside a Medicare Advantage plan they are paid according to the plan contract. Federal law sets a floor of at least 100% of the Medicare rate — that is a floor on the arrangement, not a guarantee that a given plan pays these specific code families on the same terms, or separately at all.
  • Read the model accordingly Every figure here is a fee-for-service figure. The Medicare Advantage book is larger, it is not modeled, and it should be priced contract by contract before anyone budgets against it. Treat it as additive and unquantified.
  • 11,348 beneficiaries aged 85 and over in Arapahoe County alone — the highest-acuity, highest-yield remote monitoring segment there is.
A quantified readmission gap, in the division's own accountable care organization
  • The right entity The Colorado accountable care organization is HealthONE Colorado Care Partners ACO LLC (A5328) — Colorado service area, BASIC Level A, one-sided, low-revenue, started 1 Jan 2024. Correction A widely-circulated commercial record attributes a different, Idaho/Utah/Wyoming accountable care organization to this group; that is a data error and should not be repeated.
  • Not a participant HealthONE Heart Care LLC is not a participant TIN in A5328. All 34 participant TINs are primary care, family medicine, women's health or pediatrics — unsurprising, because accountable-care assignment is driven by primary care. The commercial consequence is worth being precise about: the group carries no shared-savings upside of its own.
  • 0.12% vs 3.01% A5328 missed its minimum savings rate in PY2024 by a wide margin — a 0.12% savings rate against a 3.01% requirement, on 9,906 assigned beneficiaries.
  • 0.1608 vs 0.1517 Its hospital-wide 30-day all-cause readmission result is worse than the accountable-care-organization mean. That is a verified, quantified readmission problem sitting inside the same division that now carries mandatory 30-day episode risk on six hospitals.
The thesis, stated narrowly so it survives scrutiny. Six hospitals in one division took on mandatory 30-day episode accountability on 1 January 2026, CABG included. The cardiology group whose clinicians manage those thirty days holds no CCN, works in a different clinical record, and bills nothing at all for transitional care management, remote monitoring or principal care management. The division's own accountable care organization already reports a readmission result worse than its peer mean. Those are four facts describing one problem — and a remote care service line is the only one of them that is a thing you can buy.
Post-CABG & Post-Procedure
Coronary Artery Disease
Resistant Hypertension
Atrial Fibrillation & Anticoagulation
The Operating Model

One Service Line, Three Sequenced Layers

This is a named service line with its own owner, P&L and scorecard, not a point solution bolted onto one condition. It follows the Medicare patient from the hospital bed back into the clinic and then across the year — built once, reused for every lever the division already cares about.

1 · At Discharge — TCM
  • What Structured 30-day post-discharge management: contact within two business days, medication reconciliation, and a face-to-face visit inside the window.
  • Why here The roster recorded 524 initial-hospital-care beneficiaries and 944 on subsequent hospital care in CY2024, and billed zero transitional care management against any of them. That is the largest untouched funnel in the account.
  • Leverage This is the layer that moves the six mandatory-TEAM hospitals' 30-day episode performance — the thing the model actually reconciles on.
2 · The First Two Weeks — Short-Window RPM
  • What A 2–15-day device supply and first-10-minute management bundle (99445 · 99470) placed on the patient at discharge, before the 30-day clock runs out.
  • Why here CY2026 is the first year this window is cleanly billable. Post-discharge weight, blood pressure and pulse are where a readmission is either caught or missed.
  • Leverage Directly targets the readmission result the division's accountable care organization already reports as worse than its peer mean.
3 · Across the Year — RPM + PCM
  • RPM Device-based physiologic monitoring — weight, blood pressure, pulse — as the continuous early-warning and titration layer across the coronary, hypertension and rhythm panels.
  • PCM Principal Care Management for a single high-risk cardiac condition — cardiology-native chronic management between the acute episode and stability.
  • Modeled The value analysis below models RPM and PCM only. Transitional care management revenue is deliberately excluded from the forecast and sits as upside on top.
The staffing answer, up front. CoachCare operates the engine — enrollment outreach, device logistics, 24/7 monitoring, escalation, and billing-ready documentation — while the group's physicians govern the protocols and make every clinical decision. Launch requires no new headcount on the group's side. The forecast also assumes one on-site enrollment specialist funded by CoachCare: that specialist is CoachCare's expense and embedded value, and is never a deduction from practice margin.
One thing this page will not claim. Heart failure is the least-built part of this service line, not the most. CY2024 shows 15 beneficiary-instances on 93297 — remote implantable hemodynamic monitoring — attributable to a single clinician, and no heart-failure clinic or disease-management program is advertised anywhere on the group's site. There is no established heart-failure cohort to point at here, and the model does not assume one. The anchor cohort is the device-monitoring population and the post-discharge funnel.

The CY2026 Billing Stack

ServiceCodes~CY2026 MagnitudeCardiovascular UseIn the model?
Transitional Care Management99495 · 99496~$200 / ~$280Every cardiac and post-procedure discharge from the six mandatory-TEAM hospitalsNo — upside
RPM setup & device supply99453 · 99454 · 99445 (new)~$20 setup · ~$52/mo99445 unlocks the 2–15-day post-discharge window inside the episodeYes
RPM treatment management99457 · 99458 · 99470 (new)~$52 + ~$41 add'lMonthly review, titration, escalationYes
Principal Care Management99424 · 99425 · 99426 · 99427~$60 + ~$50 add'lA single high-risk cardiac condition expected to last ≥3 monthsYes

The value analysis below uses CY2026 rates auto-resolved by MAC carrier and locality for zip 80012 — CO • 04112-01.
And the fact that governs this table: these are fee-schedule figures, and 57.6% of Arapahoe County's Medicare beneficiaries are in Medicare Advantage. For that majority, what these code families pay is set by the plan contract. Federal law sets a floor of at least 100% of the Medicare rate; it does not guarantee that any particular plan pays remote monitoring or care management on the same terms, or unbundled.

One Build, Every Lever

The same infrastructure — enrollment, devices, alert triage, escalation, documentation, billing capture — powers each thing the division already cares about.

The mandatory 30-day episode
Six hospitals, one division, one live obligation running from 1 January 2026 to 31 December 2030. A structured post-discharge cadence with monitoring inside the first fourteen days is the in-period operating answer to a risk the hospitals already carry — and the cardiology group is the only actor positioned to run it, because it is the one seeing the patient after discharge.
The device cohort as the pilot
1,282 remote-device beneficiary-instances are the shortest path to a live program. Consent exists, the data habit exists, and the clinic workflow exists. Attaching physiologic monitoring and principal care management to a population already conditioned to remote review is materially faster than building enrollment from a cold panel.
The record seam
The ambulatory clinics run eClinicalWorks; the inpatient episode is recorded elsewhere. Closing that seam with a daily discharge trigger and an enrollment order inside the chart the clinicians already use is the single most concrete operational deliverable in this account — see the section below.
Rural and out-of-state outreach
Clinicians hold practice addresses in Del Norte, Alamosa, Burlington, Wray and Haxtun in Colorado, and in Grant, Sidney and Ogallala in Nebraska. That is exactly the geography where in-person follow-up costs the most and happens the least. Continuous remote care is a coverage instrument there, not only a revenue line.
Procedural throughput
Remote post-procedure surveillance supports faster, safer discharge after transcatheter valve work, left-atrial-appendage occlusion, ablation and device implant — all performed inside hospitals in the same division. Faster recovery pathways free hospital capacity and protect case throughput, and renal denervation for resistant hypertension is a procedure whose durability is judged on exactly the blood-pressure trend an RPM program captures.
Adherence-dependent therapy
$436,532 of inclisiran on 74 beneficiaries in CY2024 is a twice-yearly, office-administered injectable whose entire value depends on the patient returning. A monitored panel with scheduled non-visit touches is the mechanism that keeps a therapy like that on schedule — and the same is true of the anticoagulation clinic already running.
The Strongest Operational Argument in This Account

The Record Seam: An Ambulatory Chart the Episode Cannot See

In most accounts the electronic health record is a scoping question — which connector, which version, how long. Here it is the argument. The hospital owns the thirty-day episode. The cardiology group owns the follow-up that decides how the episode ends. And the two do not share a record.

What is verified about the ambulatory platform
  • Confirmed The clinics run eClinicalWorks. The patient portal resolves to an eClinicalWorks-hosted portal on the mycw39 instance in the vendor's region3 cloud, at eClinicalWorks' standard portal login path on its own hosting domain.
  • Confirmed Telehealth is delivered through Healow — eClinicalWorks' patient-engagement and telehealth product — with vendor-specific patient instructions on the group's own telehealth page.
  • Corroborating The CMS telehealth flag is set for 13 of the 48 enrolled clinicians, consistent with an active Healow deployment rather than an unused license.
  • What the site is not evidence of The .dot URL pattern across the public site is the health system's corporate web content-management convention, with assets loading from its enterprise web infrastructure. That is evidence about who owns the marketing site — not about the clinical system.
What is not verified — and how we will treat it
  • Flag Unconfirmed The specific product used as the health system's inpatient record is not established from a cited public source. The research file reports it as MEDITECH; that assertion carries no citation and is not treated as fact here. Confirm the hospital-side record before any integration scoping.
  • What is established is the thing that actually matters: the ambulatory clinics run their own eClinicalWorks environment and are not inside the health system's inpatient record. The seam exists regardless of which product sits on the inpatient side.
  • Also open Whether the division has an active project to consolidate the ambulatory record onto a system standard. That changes integration effort and sequencing, and it is a discovery question, not a finding.
  • No commitment made here No interface cost, timeline or capability is priced into the forecast on this page, and none is claimed. Scoping happens after the platform on both sides is confirmed directly.
THE HEALTH SYSTEM'S INPATIENT RECORD · SIX MANDATORY TEAM HOSPITALS The hospital owns the 30-day episode — and is reconciled on it CABG and cardiac discharges · accountability attaches to the CCN · 1 Jan 2026 – 31 Dec 2030 Day 0 discharge THE SEAM · NO SHARED RECORD The discharge is not an event in the ambulatory chart · the two-business-day clock starts late or not at all The discharge medication list and the clinic medication list diverge · the 14-day window is half gone before anyone has a weight THE GROUP'S AMBULATORY RECORD · ECLINICALWORKS + HEALOW · CONFIRMED The cardiology group owns the follow-up that decides how the episode ends Day 1–2 contact · Day 5–8 detection window · Day 12–14 visit and the 99445 window · then the longitudinal panel Day 30 episode closes
Closes the seam · 1

A daily discharge trigger

The one piece that has to be designed rather than configured: a process or feed that surfaces yesterday's inpatient discharges to the ambulatory team on the day they happen, and starts the two-business-day clock automatically.

Closes the seam · 2

One enrollment order, inside the chart

Referral into the service line is a single order in eClinicalWorks — not a separate system, a separate login, or a paper form. Enrollment status, program and device are visible at the point of the next clinical decision.

Closes the seam · 3

Monitoring from day one

A device on the patient inside the 2–15-day window, with weight, blood pressure and pulse flowing before the point where a readmission becomes likely — and a documented escalation standard behind every reading.

Closes the seam · 4

Documentation written back

Vitals, evidence of care and care plans returned into the ambulatory chart on a monthly cadence, and the per-patient claim generated by the billing engine rather than assembled by hand — which at a modeled 6,270 active enrollments is the difference between a program that bills what it delivers and one that quietly stops.

Integration capabilities are CoachCare-provided. The value analysis on this page does not assume any particular integration depth: no interface cost, timeline or capability is priced into the forecast, and none is claimed here.

The Clinical Twin of the Value Analysis

Clinical Governance & Escalation

The economics prove the service line pays. This proves it is safe and disciplined. Every reading a patient takes routes through one shared escalation engine with defined thresholds, defined trends, defined routing and a defined documentation standard — so the care team receives signal, not noise, and never carries surveillance liability it did not agree to.

One shared escalation engine

Both programs in this service line — remote physiologic monitoring and principal care management — route through the same logic. The engine is program-agnostic; the thresholds are set with the practice.

1

Critical value → escalate immediately

A reading at a critical threshold escalates regardless of whether the patient reports symptoms. There is no "wait and see" branch on a critical value, and no client preference can suppress it.

2

Out of range → retake, then symptom check

A non-critical out-of-range reading is worked rather than forwarded: confirm technique, retake, then run a structured symptom check. Most out-of-range readings resolve here — which is exactly why the clinic inbox stays clean.

3

Trend is defined objectively

An out-of-range trend is not a judgment call. It is three consecutive readings at least one hour apart for blood pressure or glucose, or three readings within seven days for heart rate. A confirmed trend escalates on the same footing as a threshold breach.

4

Unreachable is not a dead end

If the patient cannot be reached, the attempt is documented, a voicemail and callback request are left — and if the reading was critical or a confirmed trend, the escalation proceeds anyway. Silence never downgrades a clinical finding.

5

Every escalation is documented the same way

Six fields, every time, so the record is auditable and any event can be reconstructed end to end.

VitalFindingsMethodContactOutcomeFollow-up
The emergent pathway — non-negotiable
  • Triggers Chest pain · new shortness of breath · signs of stroke · syncope · worst-ever headache · sudden swelling. Any of these reported during an outreach call activates the emergent protocol immediately.
  • Action 911 is called with the patient still on the line — the call is not ended and handed off.
  • If refused If the patient declines emergency services, they are routed to the clinic and the refusal is documented; if the situation warrants it, CoachCare activates 911 regardless.
  • The guarantee CoachCare's urgent and emergent policy supersedes any client-specific escalation preference. A practice can shape routing for everything else. It cannot lower the floor on an emergency.
Three-way routing — so the care team sees signal, not noise
  • Emergency Emergent symptoms or a critical value with clinical instability → 911, with the practice notified.
  • Non-critical A confirmed out-of-range reading or trend without emergent features → routed to the defined practice team member named in the escalation matrix, within the agreed window.
  • Stable / resolved Worked, retaken, resolved, patient asymptomatic → documented as an FYI in the record, not pushed as an alert. This is the branch that determines whether the program is sustainable in a group that already runs a device inbox at scale.
  • Named, not assumed The routing matrix — who receives what, in what window, and who covers after hours — is agreed with the practice before the first patient enrolls, not improvised afterward.

The post-discharge three-touch cadence

Triggered automatically by any emergency-room visit or hospitalization reported in the last 60 days. This is the readmission-prevention spine — the mechanism behind the 439 hospitalizations avoided in the forecast below — and it is the operating answer to a 30-day episode obligation that six hospitals in this division now carry.

Touch 1 · Day 1–2

Stabilize

Confirm the patient is home and safe, reconcile discharge medications against what is actually in the house, verify follow-up appointments exist, and confirm the monitoring device is set up and transmitting. Clinical alerts documented and escalated per the engine above.

Touch 2 · Day 5–8

Detect

The window where post-discharge decompensation typically declares itself. Symptom review, weight and blood-pressure trend review against the readings already flowing in, adherence check, and escalation on any confirmed threshold or trend.

Touch 3 · Day 12–14

Secure

Confirm the follow-up visit happened, close open issues, verify the patient understands the escalation path, and hand the patient into the longitudinal monitoring panel so the 30-day window closes with continuity rather than a cliff.

Continuity and discharge governance

Patients do not silently fall out of the program, and the care team is notified at every decision point.

A

Unreachable → escalate on a fixed cadence

A patient who stops responding is escalated to the practice first, then re-escalated every 30 days — not quietly dropped and not left accruing.

B

A hard backstop

If no instruction is received from the practice, discharge proceeds at 180 days. The clinic is notified in every case, and discharges generally process in the first week of the following month.

C

The practice always decides

Clinical discharge criteria, escalation thresholds and routing are the practice's to set. CoachCare executes them consistently and documents the execution — it does not overrule clinical judgment, with the single exception of the emergent floor above.

D

Auditable by design

Because every escalation carries the same six documented fields, any episode can be reconstructed end-to-end — which is what a risk-bearing conversation about a mandatory episode model actually requires.

What this section deliberately does not do. It does not price anything, quote a code, or claim a clinical outcome. Escalation thresholds, the routing matrix and the discharge criteria are configured with the group's physicians during protocol design — the logic above is the standard operating floor, not a substitute for that design session.
CoachCare Value Analysis · Modeled for Aurora Denver Cardiology Associates

The Value Analysis

A 24-month forecast for a two-program service line — remote physiologic monitoring and principal care management — across seven offices, 48 referring providers, one CoachCare-funded on-site enrollment specialist, and CY2026 rates auto-resolved for MAC locality CO • 04112-01. Transitional care management revenue, 30-day episode performance, avoided-admission savings and procedural throughput are not in these numbers. Neither is any Medicare Advantage volume. They are upside on top.

Enrolled Services Under Active Management

Monthly active enrollment by program · physician referrals (8 per provider per month across 48 providers at 80% acceptance) plus one on-site enrollment specialist at 80 per month and a small telephonic stream, net of a 1.5% monthly discharge rate. RPM reaches its enrollment ceiling of 4,351 in month 18; PCM is still climbing at month 24.

Monthly Economics — Net Reimbursement, Fees, Practice Margin

Net reimbursement after a 13% blended reduction for denials, coinsurance and bad debt, against CoachCare fees. Month 1 runs a $778 deficit on implementation; the program turns margin-positive in month 2 and never looks back.

24-Month Net Reimbursement Mix

$8.94M total across the two-program stack. RPM is the ceiling-pinned engine; PCM is the longitudinal chronic layer that is still climbing at month 24.

The Financial Summary

LineYear 1Year 224-Month
RPM net reimbursement$1,786,299$4,930,973$6,717,272
PCM net reimbursement$537,639$1,684,788$2,222,426
Total net reimbursement$2,323,938$6,615,761$8,939,698
CoachCare fees$1,348,276$3,807,767$5,156,043
Practice net (after fees)$975,662$2,807,993$3,783,655
Practice margin41.98%42.44%42.32%
Includes one on-site enrollment specialist staffed at CoachCare's expense — embedded value already reflected in the fees above, never a deduction from practice margin.

Month-1 practice profit is −$778; the first profitable month is month 2. Fee-for-service only. The full model is available as a companion workbook.

159,571

Billed Claims / Units

Recurring, subscription-like professional-fee volume over 24 months — on top of the existing procedural and imaging book, not instead of it. At this volume the claim has to be generated by the billing engine, not assembled by hand.

691,780

Physiologic Readings

A continuous clinical picture of the coronary, hypertension and rhythm panels between visits — the physiologic twin of the device data these clinicians already review every week.

~439

Hospitalizations Avoided

Roughly $6.6M of avoided acute cost at an assumed $15K per admission — and direct 30-day episode relief for six mandatory-TEAM hospitals in the same division.

34.5

FTE-Equivalent Absorbed

71,844 care-team hours of monitoring, outreach, escalation and documentation carried by the service line rather than by the group's own staff.

Everything in this section is priced at fee-for-service rates for MAC locality CO • 04112-01; the Medicare Advantage majority of this market is not modeled and is contract-dependent.

Test the Assumptions Yourself

Scenario Explorer

Every input below is an assumption, and every assumption is arguable. Move them and the 24-month forecast recomputes live. At the modeled settings this engine reproduces the companion Value Analysis workbook exactly — so any disagreement you have with the output is really a disagreement with an input, which is a much more productive conversation.

Build Your Own Forecast

Defaults are the modeled scenario. Enrollment ceilings are recomputed as panel × eligibility × conversion; RPM eligibility is 75% of the in-scope panel and PCM 85%.
24-mo net reimbursement
$8.94M
24-mo practice margin
$3.78M
Margin %
42.3%
Enrolled services at M24
6,270
Hospitalizations avoided
~439

"Enrolled services" counts active program enrollments; a patient enrolled in both programs counts twice. At month 24 the model's 6,270 enrolled services correspond to 4,927 unique patients once dual enrollment is deduplicated. All outputs are fee-for-service.

Implementation

Chartered in 30 Days.
Piloting by Day 90.

CoachCare operates the engine — enrollment outreach, device logistics, 24/7 monitoring, escalation and billing-ready documentation — while the group's physicians govern the protocols and make every clinical decision. Full-service delivery means launch requires no new headcount on the group's side, and the on-site enrollment specialist in the model is funded by CoachCare.

0–30 Days

Charter and Confirm

Name the service-line owner, the P&L and the scorecard, and confirm where the decision sits — group leadership, the division, or physician services. Confirm the billing configuration for MAC locality CO • 04112-01. Agree the escalation matrix and discharge criteria. Confirm the hospital-side inpatient record and its interface surface. Commission the Medicare Advantage contract review.

31–90 Days

Pilot Two Anchor Cohorts

First, the device-monitoring population — already consented, already transmitting, already inside a clinic workflow. Second, post-discharge patients from the mandatory-TEAM hospitals, on the three-touch cadence with short-window RPM placed at discharge. Stand up the daily discharge trigger in parallel; it is the piece that has to be designed rather than configured.

91–180 Days

Scale Across the Seven Offices

Aurora, Castle Rock, Centennial, Englewood, Greenwood Village, Lakewood and Lone Tree enrolling, with the rural and out-of-state outreach clinics added as the second wave — that is where remote follow-up is worth the most. Monthly scorecard — census, capture rate, revenue per patient-month, escalation volume, readmission signal — reporting to service-line governance.

181–365 Days

Enter 2027 With an Episode Track Record

A documented 30-day post-discharge performance record to take into the division's episode-model conversation, a readmission signal to set against the accountable care organization's PY2024 result, and a standing program rather than a plan when the CY2027 fee schedule lands.

About CoachCare

The Experience to Get It Right

The service line described on this page runs on infrastructure already proven at national scale.

500,000+

Patients Managed

Over 400 managed conditions for more than 500,000 patients.

10,000+

Clinicians on the Platform

Providers running remote care programs on the CoachCare platform.

1,000+

Implementations

Programs implemented and operating in market.

5M+

Claims Generated

Care plan coding and billing that has produced over five million claims.

100M+

Vitals Recorded

Over 100 million vitals recorded and more than four million care actions enabled.

Policy Watch · CMS-1848-P

2027 Proposed Rule Insights

CMS's CY2027 Physician Fee Schedule proposed rule, published July 16, 2026, proposes to reprice remote physiologic monitoring. Here is what it reaches, what it leaves alone, and how the operating model behind this service line absorbs it.

1

The Proposal Is Confined to RPM

CMS's remote-monitoring proposals sit in one code family: RPM. CCM, PCM, and TCM are not part of them. That distinction lands directly on this forecast — PCM carries $2,222,426 of the modeled $8,939,698 in 24-month net reimbursement, and the TCM touch at discharge is outside the proposal entirely. Neither is in scope.

2

CoachCare Is Building the Contingencies Now

The delivery model has more than one shape, and CoachCare is preparing each so the service line's economics hold wherever the rule settles. One unbundles the program into its parts — SaaS platform, device logistics, and program enablement — priced as components. Another engages CoachCare to run the staffing itself, an MSO-style arrangement in which the practice owns the clinical program and the billing while CoachCare carries the labor model. Neither requires re-architecting the service line described on this page.

3

ACCESS Moves Remote Care to Risk-Based PMPM

Alongside the fee schedule, CMS's ACCESS Model pays remote care as a risk-based per-member-per-month arrangement rather than per code: recurring per-beneficiary payments, half of each one withheld and reconciled against outcome attainment. Cardiometabolic care is among its four clinical tracks. What earns under that structure — controlled pressures, titrated therapy, decompensations caught early — is what this service line is built to produce.

What the Proposal Actually Takes Off This Forecast

This forecast repriced code by code at CMS's CY2027 proposed values, at this practice's own MAC locality rather than national averages. Same enrollment, same phasing plan — only the rates move.

−20.6%
The headline per-code cut — device supply (99454 / 99445), the code the proposal reprices hardest.
−9.1%
The RPM patient-year, because device supply is only 32% of it — the management codes barely move.
−6.9%
The whole service line, because PCM carries 24.9% of the forecast and is not in scope.
RPM alone — the only code family in scope$6,717,272 over 24 months
−$609,774
−9.1% of RPM
The whole service line — RPM + PCM$8,939,698 over 24 months
−$614,449
−6.9% of the whole

Both bars run on the same dollar scale, so the red slice is nearly the same width in each — the same dollars, measured against a larger base. The empty track on the top bar is the care-management revenue RPM alone does not include.

RPM, retained at CY2027 proposed rates The proposed reduction PCM — not in scope

Repriced at this locality's own geographic adjusters. The RPM reductions fall almost entirely on practice expense, so the untouched work component carries more weight in some localities than others; the same repricing at national rates would be −8.8% on RPM. Of the $614,449, RPM accounts for $609,774 and the care-management arm for $4,675.

Where the Proposal Lands, Code Family by Code Family

CY2026 versus CMS's published CY2027 proposed values, shown at national non-facility amounts so they can be read against CMS's own tables. This practice's locality-adjusted amounts differ; the repricing above uses the local figures.

Code familyWhat CMS proposedCY2026CY2027 proposedChange
In scope — remote physiologic monitoring
99454 / 99445 · device supplyPractice expense recrosswalked$52.11$41.38−21%
99457 · management, first 20 minDirect practice expense removed$51.77$49.59−4%
99458 · management, each addl 20 minDirect practice expense removed$41.42$40.39−2%
99453 · setup and patient educationCrosswalked; one-time per patient$21.71$20.03−8%
Not in scope — the codes the proposal does not reach
99424–99427 · PCMNo structural change proposed$67.80$67.00−1%
99495 / 99496 · TCMNot addressed by the proposalOutside the remote-monitoring provisions entirely

National non-facility amounts; CY2027 values are CMS's own published proposals in Addendum B of CMS-1848-P. The care-management rows show the lead code in each family; every code in those families moves within about 4% in either direction, which is ordinary annual movement rather than a repricing. The RPM reductions are also phased — section 1848(c)(7) of the Act caps any one code's total-RVU reduction at 19% in a single year, and CMS publishes the affected codes, so CY2027 is a single-digit year for a typical program and the remainder arrives no earlier than CY2028.

None of this is final. CMS-1848-P is a proposed rule. Comments are due September 14, 2026, the final rule is expected in early November, and it takes effect January 1, 2027. CoachCare is leading the advocacy — filing comments, putting the device cost and pricing evidence in front of CMS that the rule itself states the agency does not have, and helping practices file their own. This practice gets the final rates, and the model rerun against them, the week they publish.